Input: Northwind Studios LLC, Delaware, member-managed, pro-rata voting, transfer restrictions on. Member 1: Ana Reyes, 60%, $30,000. Member 2: Dev Patel, 40%, $20,000.
Result: Ownership totals 100%, so the document generates. Article 2 lists both members with percentages and contributions, Article 3 records member management with votes in proportion to ownership, Article 5.1 requires unanimous written consent for any transfer, and Article 7.4 sets amendments at 66.67% of ownership interests.
Input: Harbor Lane Rentals LLC, Texas, manager-managed with Priya Shah as manager, per-capita voting, one member (Priya Shah, 100%, $5,000), fiscal year ending December 31.
Result: Article 3 names the manager and grants them authority over the business, and Article 4.2 puts distribution timing in the manager’s hands rather than a member vote. Because voting is per-capita, Article 7.4 requires a majority of members to amend. The signature page prints one member line plus a Texas notary acknowledgment.
Input: Three members entered at 50%, 30% and 15% — a total of 95% — with everything else filled in.
Result: The members card reads "Total Ownership: 95.00% (Must equal 100%)" and generation is blocked with a prompt to fix the split. Raising the third member from 15% to 20% brings the total to exactly 100% and the agreement generates unchanged in every other respect.